A Conference on "The New Normal" for Creative Professionals

CHF Responds to The New York Times

In a recent New York Times profile of KAWS (aka Brian Donnelly), the famed visual artist talks about the industry’s implicit prejudice against so-called commercial art, which seems to be a kind of code for art that actually generates substantial income for its creator. As KAWS puts it, “There’s a sense that you can be a commercial artist or a fine artist, but you cannot do both.”

When we here at CHF read this piece, we felt compelled to respond to it. Although the newspaper did not publish our letter, we share it with you here.

To the Editor:

Art Business Conference

Should commercial success taint an artist’s work? Your profile of the artist KAWS (“XX Marks the Spot,” May 15, 2019) reveals the destructive bias that persists among a large swath of the art world. If the answer to the question is yes, then the only logical conclusion is that visual artists must starve for legitimacy. And starve they do; a recent survey found that a majority earn less than $30,000 per year, despite contributing hundreds of billions of dollars to our nation’s economy—nearly five times more than the agricultural sector.

Does The Starry Night’s high price tag diminish Vincent van Gogh’s standing as an artist? Or is his success acceptable to the industry’s gatekeepers because he never reaped the financial benefits? Do the rules apply only to the work of living artists? And who gets to set these rules, anyway?

The organization I work for provides artists with business training, something they rarely receive in art school. The biggest hurdle we face is not in teaching artists how to market their art, manage their finances, or negotiate a contract—they do fine on all counts when given the chance—but rather it’s in helping them to overcome the archaic belief that they don’t deserve to make a sustainable living from their work, even as the rest of the industry makes a fine living off of them.

Sofia Perez
Editorial Director, The Clark Hulings Fund for Visual Artists

Letter to Editor -NYT re: KAWS piece

How to Sell More Art

Sell More Art

Sign up (free) for an introductory course for professional artists: Sales Strategies for Growth.

!
!
!
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

4 thoughts on “CHF Responds to The New York Times”

  1. Avatar
    Andie Freeman

    Fantastic response Sofia! I wish they had published it and think they missed an opportunity by not doing so. Thanks for sticking up for all of us working artists!
    Andie

    1. Sofia Perez

      You’re very welcome, Andie. Professional artists work hard, and they deserve to reap the rewards of their labor!

    1. Sofia Perez

      Happy to do so. I face these same battles as a writer, and it infuriates me when people imply that financial success = total sellout.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finding This Valuable?

Bring more with a gift of any amount. Even small ones help.

Share This